Search for: "In re: Application to Issue Subpoena"
Results 341 - 360
of 717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
-U.K. agreement that would be the first specific application of the legislation if it is enacted. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
” In re Warrant, 15 F. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
If a judge decides that probable cause for the crime exists, the warrant will be issued. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
” If you’re a federal contractor, you are probably painfully aware of this requirement, and already track the race, sex, and ethnicity of everyone in your applicant pools. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:03 pm
Proposal would put other agencies on 90-day clock to complete review of possible national security issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Lerner, former Director, Exempt Organizations, Internal Revenue Service, in contempt of Congress for refusal to comply with a subpoena duly issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm
It's what prevents the mechanical application of the law in a fashion that would itself be tyrannical. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
The issuing judge granted the application and signed the search warrant as submitted. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:00 am
It argued that “Congress had not enacted any statute or rule that gave the District Court the jurisdiction to issue a Rule 45 subpoena for service on SAS, a Cayman Islands citizen, in the Cayman Islands or the jurisdiction to enforce the subpoena against SAS after SAS failed to respond. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Applicable Legal Standards Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm
They shall conduct business according to rules of procedure they shall adopt by a vote of two-thirds of each body, which shall include power to select their presidents and other officials.6.1.1 Such legislative power, may not be subdelegated to staff, administrators, magistrates, or courts, but 6.1.2 Executive officials may issue directives or regulations to government employees or contractors under their supervision, which directives or regulations shall be subject to review by the Diet or… [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm
They shall conduct business according to rules of procedurethey shall adopt by a vote of two-thirds of each body, which shall include power to select their presidents and other officials.6.1.1 Such legislative power, may not be subdelegated to staff, administrators, magistrates, or courts, but 6.1.2 Executive officials may issue directives or regulations to government employees or contractors under their supervision, which directives or regulations shall be subject to review by the Diet or… [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Re/code: Microsoft, Google agree to stop complaining to regulators about each other. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
Rather, the company can have its day in court if and when the attorney general sues to enforce the subpoena. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:42 am
“With our current laws, we’re not getting accurate information because the issue is not being addressed at the heart of the problem – with the people causing the collisions. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
SOME BACKGROUND The Device at Issue. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
It has now been over 10 months since the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee issued a subpoena to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) seeking critical information regarding the Agency’s approval of Xarelto following a single clinical trial. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
I’ll save the really interesting policy questions for a future post and focus here only on the issue of existing law. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
I think—it is a technical issue. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:59 am
”Id. at *5-6 (quoting In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 87 F.3d 377, 381-83 (9th Cir. 1996)).The Ninth Circuit identified a circuit split (are you listening, Supremes?) [read post]
