Search for: "In re B. S."
Results 341 - 360
of 28,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am
AK brought the present JR, asserting that: a) the policy discriminates indirectly against women without proper justification contrary to s19 and thus s29 of the Equality Act 2010 b) Westminster was in breach of the Public Sector Equality Duty in failing to assess the policy’s impact, and c) the policy amounted to a breach of Article 14 ECHR obligations, read with Article 8. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
When you file a lawsuit, you’re probably looking to get some sort of financial compensation based on your injuries. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In a guest post this week, Shirani Herbert reviewed the “errors, irregularities and illegality” following the removal of pews under licence arising in Re: Church of St Michael, Bath, Twerton-on-Avon [2024] ECC B&W 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 pm
Or, to return to the beginning, B+. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
THE BAGGAGE BELT IN TERMINAL B BROKE DOWN THIS MORNING, AND THAT BELT TAKES THE LUGGAGE FROM THE CHECK IN COUNTER OUT TO THE TARMAC. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
Formularfeld «Bitte erkläre, wie sich diese Verarbeitung auf dich auswirkt. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:47 am
” “That’s why people see me and they’re like, ‘Why’s this dude always mad? [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:48 pm
WE’RE STARTING TO SEE, EVEN ON A DAILY OCCURRENCE, UP TO 24,000 PEOPLE COMING THROUGH THE AIRPORT. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
” In their petitions, Nick Feliciano, Evan Nordby, and Charles Flynn – supported by the congressional sponsors of the legislation, veteran advocacy groups, and a group of 20 states and the District of Columbia – say that the Federal Circuit’s reading is atextual and shortchanges veterans who can’t plan for their families during their deployments when they’re unsure whether their service will be counted. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am
By doing so, the doctrine erroneously conflates the merits of an insurer’s confirmation objection with the threshold question under section 1109(b) of whether the insurer qualifies as a part in interest. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 11:30 am
Evacuation orders are still in place for the following zones: CCU – 147-C, CCU – 152-B, CCU – 153-B, CCU -168-B. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:10 am
When Donat-Pourrières denied that the Parmigianino was a forgery and refused to return the money, Sotheby’s also sued Donat-Pourrières in 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:10 am
When Donat-Pourrières denied that the Parmigianino was a forgery and refused to return the money, Sotheby’s also sued Donat-Pourrières in 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
In re Time USA, LLC, Serial No. 90493176 (June 17, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:25 am
If you’re tracking what you eat each day, you’re less likely to have a donut and a milkshake for breakfast. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:24 am
In re Alex Avila, Serial No. 97253987 (June 11, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:56 pm
In a guest post, Shirani Herbert, Legal Correspondent of the Church Times, reviews the errors, irregularities and illegality following the removal of pews under licence Re: Church of St Michael, Bath, Twerton-on-Avon, [2024] ECC B&W 1 What happens when property belonging to a church is disposed of unlawfully by a third party and is unlikely to be retrieved? [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
§ 20.2031-1(b) (the “value of every item of property includible in a decedent’s gross estate . . . is its fair market value at the time of the decedent’s death”) and concluded that a hypothetical buyer would treat the life-insurance proceeds as a net asset because, at the time of Michael’s death, they had not yet been used to redeem his shares and therefore existed as a Company asset. [read post]
