Search for: "In re Connor"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
Chief Justice O’Connor also wrote a brief dissent, mostly joining Justice Stewart’s dissent. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
“The City says, if you just release the officers from their personal liability, we will enter into this agreement where you can pursue indemnification. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
The lineup reminds me of a time when Justice Sandra Day O’Connor announced a similarly complex listing and quipped that there appeared to be “more opinions that there are justices. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 11:10 am
“Certainly, we’re pleased that our veterans’ proposal passed the Senate with unanimous and bipartisan support. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
And the case of In Re M.B. is distinguishable because that case dealt with gifts to the child, not child support pursuant to judicial decree. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:51 am
Breyer called for a re-examination of the 2004 Supreme Court decision – Hamdi v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:51 am
Breyer called for a re-examination of the 2004 Supreme Court decision – Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:07 am
Connors stated that the complainant had been frightened and terrorized. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Katz, 546 U.S. 356 (2006), Justice O’Connor joined the four dissenters in Seminole Tribe in holding that Congress has the power to subject states to proceedings in federal court under a different Article I power, the Bankruptcy Clause. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Kate Shaw is a law professor at Cardozo Law School. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
”) In re M.A., 2016-Ohio-1161 (11th Dist.) [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:01 pm
As we learned in Tom O’Connor’s recent five part blog series, it seems as though the eDiscovery deck is stacked against plaintiff’s attorneys. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
Wade—Central Hudson prong one (and relatedly Zauderer) are hard to kill because they’re really the only way that commercial deception stays actionable while false political speech is generally protected.But consider a few recent cases: Mississippi Bd. of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
The majority opinion written by Chief Justice Rehnquist (and joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) stressed the "textually demonstrable commitment" of the issue to the Senate, which is given the "sole Power to try all Impeachments. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
“Do the carts have warning devices, some type of audible sound that alerts other customers that someone is approaching? [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:45 am
But he is not Bull Connor or one of the other violent segregationists with whom Dr. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:26 pm
We’re running out of time to stop this! [read post]
2 May 2019, 4:09 pm
Here’s why we’re not prosecuting your guy. [read post]
