Search for: "In re D. F."
Results 341 - 360
of 9,704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
”[2] The SEC did not include the mandatory liquidity fee in its proposal and, without re-proposing this aspect of the rule before adopting it, has not provided commenters (including the MMF industry) with a meaningful opportunity to provide input on whether the mandatory liquidity fee raises many of the same potential negative consequences for MMFs and their shareholders as the proposed swing pricing framework.[3] In addition, the SEC amendments permit stable net asset value… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy In B.D. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:27 am
Naomi Cahn and Julia D. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:22 am
"The f—k is wrong with you people?... [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
In re Core Communications, Inc., 531 F.3d 849, 862 (D.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
Dkt. 40 (Memorandum Decision and Order Re: Motion for Summary Judgment), 2022 WL 2528266, slip op. at *8 (D. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
d. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:36 am
The Certificate of Analysis must identify: the date of sample collection the certificate number the laboratory that analysed the sample the client a product description the methodology the sample weight and number of units the test result the test date d. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:16 am
In re Operation of Mo. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
Beyond the incorporation of "all internationally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms" by operation of this instrument (¶4.1), and its underlining of specific rights of more interest to the drafters, ¶4.2(d) creates a mechanism by which these rights can be vindicated "by a representative or through class action in appropriate cases, to courts and non-judicial grievance mechanisms of the States Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Cir. 2020) (quoting In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Buck, 18 F. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
An Arkansas statute (Act 372) makes it a crime (in its section 1) for librarians and booksellers to "[f]urnish a harmful item to a minor. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
One of the most forgettable parts of the development of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights were its provisions on balancing prevent-mitigation-and remedy strategies when no matter what choice is made, there will be breaches of human rights. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
L’IPIC a d’ailleurs proposé un test qui faisait l’affaire de ses membres, et au grand bonheur des agents de brevets, le test avait été retenu par la Cour Fédérale dans son jugement de première instance. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am
However, there was a new issue that arose in In re Robert F. and In re Ja. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:18 am
Collections such as stamps, coins, etc.; d. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:17 am
Stocks, bonds, notes, and other investments; e. f. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:15 am
Stocks, bonds, notes, and other investments; e. f. [read post]
