Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 341 - 360
of 770
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 4:10 am
The world is watching.....Second-highest rated:Too bad Chief Justice Roberts did not see a need to admonish McConnell when the Senate refused to hold hearings or an up or down vote on Merrick Garland's nomination, leaving a Supreme Court seat open for a year. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
We're asking the Supreme Court to reconsider. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
Why are we stuck doing things the way they’ve always been done, rather than re-center the world around their intersectional ideology? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:23 am
A photo of Merrick Garland.... [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
No, for the same reason that the Senate had no obligation to give Merrick Garland a hearing. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:30 am
And why wasn't the partisan split such a devastating worry when Judge Merrick Garland was nominated—who would also have produced a 5-4 Court, "the most liberal Supreme Court in 50 years"? [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
On March 16, 2016, Obama nominated Merrick Garland, chief judge of the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:48 am
Garland's re-nomination was never a serious option. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
So that's Gorsuch over there, a Trump appointee who benefited from the Senate filibuster of President Obama's choice to replace the late Justice Scalia, Merrick Garland. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
Pozen (Yale 2007 / Garland), professor at Columbia Justice Antonin ScaliaJonathan C. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:26 am
Even if they’re wrong, are they understandable or forgivable? [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Just as the Democrats will one day hold up a Supreme Court seat under the “McConnell Rule” in response to the Garland nomination. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
But not because they’re a bunch of evil fools. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
With Underground Railroad I approach it similarly, re: issues of verisimilitude. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Jeanne Shaheen, among others, similarly cited the oath in their comments on Garland. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:39 pm
Based on his handling of Judge Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court, I do not expect Senator McConnell to convene an impeachment trial. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:28 am
To some, this is a proper response to the Senate's failure to consider President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal 2020 Democrats Vow to Get Tough on Lobbyists The Hill – Alex Gangitano | Published: 7/7/2019 Democratic presidential hopefuls are taking aim at the lobbying world, vowing to enact sweeping reform proposals if they win election. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In re: Shorenstein Hays-Nederlander Theatres LLC Appeals, Consol. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:42 am
Garland, Austin, Dallas and Irving also make the top 10 list at No. 5, 6, 8 and 10, respectively. [read post]
