Search for: "In re Gould"
Results 341 - 360
of 410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
Rockefeller, Jay Gould, and J. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:22 pm
If you're in one of my drafts: Either show up or put some damn thought into your pre-draft rankings. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:03 pm
I doubt that anyone pouring hydrogen peroxide over a cut is doing it because they don't trust the government or experts or because they're worried about globalization. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:43 pm
"We're seeing major national retailers struggling. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
The 9th (Gould joined by Clifton and Bybee) affirm the district court's denial of relief in this capital habeas. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:44 am
They're harmless. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:39 am
To Judge Gould, this case is all about standard of review, and a reversal is required because the bankruptcy court's decision was not clearly erroneous. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:34 pm
However, Gould warns that "the bottom line is that parents should not take their children off stimulant medication they're currently on and should not be scared to have their child go on a stimulant if that's what they and their doctors decide is the best thing for the child. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Gould and Tallman lean right in criminal cases, so -- from my "academic" court-watching chair, I'll put them down as no votes. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:56 pm
USC (Gould) 19. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:32 am
He estimates 50 percent was spent working the social media channels.Social networking is an invaluable way to connect or re-connect with people for projects, networking and job searches. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
(Gould, J., dissenting), dissent available here. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:46 pm
"The company says they're selling great too. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:12 am
I agree with Judge Gould that this is clearly a prudential (non-Article III) impediment and that, especially in cases like this one, it makes sense to resolve the appeal.So if you're a federal courts person and/or a procedure guru, here's a nice little case for your morning reading. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
But given the composition of the panel, and the knowledge that you've presumably already lost Judge Gould and Fletcher on the call (as well as, if they're drawn, both them and Judge Noonan on the ultimate result), the probability of a successful en banc vote here -- even if there is a conflict in circuit precedent -- is lower than it would ordinarily be.Stay tuned. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
Chasan Property Works Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Erica Santiago Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Mimi Nguyen Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Julia Stein Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Jen Lee Equity Investment Oi chau Homebuyer Manuel Fabian Legal Edward Lopez Legal Larry Stryker Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales Helena Ashton Brokerage - Residential Anne Zelmati Brokerage - Residential Endre Boksay… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:00 pm
But if you're already convinced that change is coming, and just want to focus on how to react, I'd put the time and money into reading about legal marketing. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron Technology… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
" In re B. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm
"This is the first case where a song that hasn't been sold is the subject in a copyright-law case--and that's very rare," said University of Southern California Gould School of Law technology and IP professor Jack Lerner to LA Weekly. [read post]
