Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 341 - 360
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2008, 4:36 pm
I.e., if the value of the collateral falls to, say, zero, then the taxpayers get stuck with the bill? [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:27 pm
When you’re stuck in this situation, you can do two things: You can use YouTube’s transcription mode to manually copy and paste relevant parts of the YouTube video into your notes, or you can download the entire video transcript (i.e., its subtitles) in a single file to refer to it later…” [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
One obviously involves our tricameral legislative system and the fact that all three branches of the legislature--i.e., the House, the Senate, and the President--have to agree in order to get any legislation at all. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
The filing of the Pike Nurseries Chapter 11 case yesterday led to me reviewing the rights of a vendor to "re-claim" (i.e., pick up from the debtor, following the appropriate procedures) goods delivered to the debtor shortly before filing. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:49 am
As we suggested in our previous post, the fact that the patents underlying MAD’s lawsuit are being re-examined could convince the judge in the lawsuit to keep the case on ice a little while longer (i.e., probably at least until the USPTO review is resolved). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:36 am
If you’re logged into Gmail, your alert will be created right away. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 11:12 am
If you aren't working today (or if you're at work but slacking), here's a place to converse. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm
Read the case and see if you're similarly situated. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:35 pm
Recent Changes to Patent Reissue Practice As discussed here at length, there have been two recent decisions of the CAFC that will impact patent reissue practice before the USPTO, In re Tanaka and In re Mostafazadeh. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 1:08 pm
The timing of the Injunction (i.e., so close in time to the January 1, 2025 filing deadline) is somewhat unfortunate because we do not know what will happen in the Lawsuit. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
In October 2022, the Biden administration again promised to “re-evaluate” U.S. ties with Saudi Arabia amid the Kingdom’s oil production cuts. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
[Post by Venkat] In re Reverb Communications, FTC No. 092-3199 (Aug. 26, 2010) (Settlement) Professor Goldman has posted a bunch about the FTC's endorsement guidelines. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 7:48 pm
It's as simple as that.Will Berne Sanders take his time tomorrow night, when I think he speaks to the Convention, talking about what a truly serious non-violent "political revolution" would require, i.e., rethinking our Constitution? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:51 pm
So we're on to Part 2 on this topic. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
In my earlier post, about asking questions when visiting open houses, I forgot one of the most important questions: How fast are things moving here, i.e. what's the timeline for receiving offers? [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:15 am
They’re not the only ones: sectors from retail and hospitality to accounting and tech temps. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:52 am
See In re: CP Ships Ltd. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 2:20 pm
With that said, re-classification of individuals to employees means that unemployment contributions have to be paid on them, the same for workers’ compensation premiums and, more importantly, overtime has to be paid if they work over forty hours. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
The Court of Appeal did not accept that reasoning, holding that res judicata principles apply in UCL cases just as they do in any other type of case. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] In re Forney Indus., No. 2019-1073, 2020 U.S. [read post]
