Search for: "In re Lang"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 2:56 pm
Tell us what you think: {lang: 'ar'} [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:16 am
lang=eng Related posts:Recognition and Res Judicata of US Class Action Judgments in European Legal Systems Andrea Pinna (Erasmus University Rotterdam) has posted “Recognition and Res... [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
L'homme du métier est obligé de tester de manière arbitraire différentes teneurs pour vérifier l'apparition de l'effet synergique. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
” Banks have re-entered the lending markets in a strong way last year after having sharply reduced the foreclosed properties and distressed loans in their portfolios as property values and the economy picked up. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
," International Migration, Early View, 25 Sept. 2023- Authors (3) = Kyrgyzstan (lead), UK (1), Kyrgyzstan/Philippines (1)- APC = USD 3400Books/book chapters:"Capturing Irregular Migrations Through a Macro-sociological Lens: The Harga Process in Twelve Steps from North Africa to Europe," Chapter in Migrations in the Mediterranean: IMISCOE Regional Reader (Springer, Oct. 2023) - Authors (2) = Algeria"Childhood Construction: Intergenerational Relations in the… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Lang, Eleventh Circuit.pdf After being charged with 70 counts of Lang's case was vacated and remanded with directions to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that the indictment was "so defective that it does not, by any reasonable construction, charge an offense for which the defendant is convicted." 7. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:28 pm
lang? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Prior to changes in the law of patent reexamination that created inter partes reexamination in 1999, (AIPA of 2002, In re Swanson), and changes to the handling of reexaminations internal to the USPTO (Central Reexamination Unit), patent reexamination was universally viewed as a fruitless exercise. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:10 am
The re-engineering of the print cycle is a much welcomed change. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:25 am
Thereafter, Fresenius II made it’s way to the CAFC to determine whether the outstanding damage award of the district court was enforceable in light of the CAFC’s decision in In re Baxter (2012). [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am
, the Court re-calibrated the level of deference the CAFC must accord to such determinations on appeal. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
One aspect of this defense was that the doctrine of equitable intervening rights applied to the claims of reissue patent RE 41,134. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
In reversing the ITC, the CAFC found that the “predetermined event” recited in claim 33 of the patent at issue (RE 36,847), was not limited to a cat exiting the litter box. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:10 am
The Board explained that since the de minimis features did not impact the overall appearance of the claimed design, citing In re Carter, 673 F.2d 1378, 1380 (CCPA 1982) for support (“The elimination of the end portions of the waistband and of any cinching of the waist portion these ends might cause are de minimis changes which would be well within the skill of an ordinary design in the art and do not create a patentably distinct design. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
Cal. 2008) for the proposition that the doctrine of intervening rights applies to re-issued patents and does not extend to certificates of correction. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:10 am
While we’re still considering this and all of the other input we have received, I wanted to share with you the factors the Office took into consideration in proposing a limit of 10 submissions. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
., In re American Academy of Science Tech Center, 367 F.3d 1359, 1362-63 (Fed. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:10 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
If the petition is deemed “defective” the filing date is still accorded and the submitting party is given several days to submit or correct the missing information so long as the re-submission can be accomplished without substantive change to the petition. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Likewise, as noted in the petition decision linked above, although the reexamination is vacated by the estoppel as to the particular setttling defendant, the unfinished business of the reexamination may be easily “re-started” by another competitor. [read post]
