Search for: "In re S. H."
Results 341 - 360
of 9,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
On the other hand, in In re JR38 [2016] AC 1131, [2015] UKSC 42 (1 July 2015), the Supreme Court held that the publication by the police of CCTV footage of rioting, to identify those involved and to deter similar activity in the future, was justified. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:42 pm
It’s just one way to help counter misinformation. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
” The dissent, which details the lengthy history of discrimination against Black people, never mentions the history of racism against Asians in America, whether the lynching of Chinese immigrants in the nineteenth century, the Chinese Exclusion Act, or Japanese internment....The Sotomayor dissent has more to say about Asian Americans, but it's a complicated move:[H]er defense of affirmative action goes further in showing how Asians are shortchanged in the… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:58 am
The State Department’s reciprocity schedule for the People’s Republic of China , for example, indicates that an H-1B visa will only be issued for 12 months. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 9:52 am
[I feel] an anger... towards... the atmosphere of society, that you’re not worth anything if you don’t do anything, and that you have to be productive. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
There, the Court upheld USCIS’s interpretation of its regulation to require employers making use of the H-1B visa program to file amended paperwork whenever they change a foreign worker’s place of employment. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
H. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:17 am
One is that if the United States is not engaged, if we’re not leading, then one of two things [will happen]: either someone else is, and probably not in a way that advances our own interests and values; or no one is, and then you can have a vacuum that’s probably going to be filled by bad things before it’s filled by good things. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:24 pm
One is that if the United States is not engaged, if we’re not leading, then one of two things [will happen]: either someone else is, and probably not in a way that advances our own interests and values; or no one is, and then you can have a vacuum that’s probably going to be filled by bad things before it’s filled by good things. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:25 am
The Judicial System of RussiaProf Kathryn Hendley and Prof Peter H. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
” (5) These protests were a subset of “instructing and requesting” resolutions of state legislatures and form part of America’s vibrant “constitutional politics,” to use Mark Graber’s phrase. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
Ownership was contested by John H. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Think Computer Corp.) on behalf of PlainSite's operator (Think Computer Corp.); an excerpt (and I'll also excerpt Johnson's counterarguments when they're filed): The plaintiff is a prolific pro se litigant who has been criticized for frivolous litigation by several judges among the many who have presided over the many pro se lawsuits that he has filed in the past three decades. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Reiff, Florida Bar Board Certified in Criminal Trial Law, Law Offices of Robert S. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
H. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:36 pm
Sarah Bileti By Sarah Bileti Question: We’re planning to lay off about 20 employees, and one of the affected workers has a sponsored H-1B visa. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
Michaeli T, Jürges H, Michaeli DT. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:19 pm
Mullen & Gail H. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
Mezei then takes us through the various re-trials and his analysis of the decisions, highlighting the limitations of their strategy as “tremendous negative externalities of the content industry’s file-sharing litigation, eg, irrecoverable damages, bad public relations and growing disobedience of copyright norms. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:53 am
by Neil H. [read post]
