Search for: "In re That Portion of Lots 1 & 2" Results 341 - 360 of 1,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 7:29 am by Kathy Tiemeier
Hepatitis C will recur for some treated patients and others may be re-infected after CHC has been cured. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Disgorgement as a remedy requires weighing (1) whether the defendant had the intent to confuse or deceive, (2) whether sales have been diverted, (3) the adequacy of other remedies, (4) any unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in asserting his rights, (5) the public interest in making the misconduct unprofitable, and (6) whether it is a case of palming off. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 10:29 am by Lindsay A. Heller
The Appellate Division rejected potential remedies of (1) contractual enforcement/indemnification because the parties did not have such an agreement; (2) offset or reallocation of equitable distribution because of the amount of time that passed and, importantly, “equitable distribution is final and not subject to a change in circumstances”; and (3) res judicata because the Supreme Court had already issued an opinion in the case of Mansell, holding that a… [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
We therefore vacate that portion of the trial court's order in paragraph (b)(5) that states: "Respondent is prohibited from communicating, publishing or communicating in any form any writing naming or regarding [petitioner], his family, or any employee, staff or member of the congregation of South Park Church in Park Ridge, IL. [read post]
Petitioners sought approval from the City Council to demolish an existing dilapidated 19th century cottage on a residential lot. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:22 am by Andrew Delaney
The trial court granted summary judgment for the City and BTC Mall Associates on two grounds: (1) the study is not a “public record” under the PRA; and (2) even if it were a public record, the redacted information is exempt as a “trade secret. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
While in the parking lot of the school, which was also attended by his daughter, Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am by Bob Ambrogi
How we’re unique: (1) The exact product missing on the market that companies need. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:26 am by Andrew Appel
A few experts (17%) prefer BMD-marked ballots to hand-marked ballots because (1) there’s no chance of ambiguous marks and (2) it’s easier to give voters feedback about undervotes/overvotes. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
There’s been a lot of movement on last week’s relists. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
” Our lead China employment lawyer, Grace Yang, is Chinese and she graduated from Beijing University Law School and I have zero doubt that she 1) knows China employment law ten times better than the Chinese companies trying to cheat their expat employees and that she 2) is going to be a helluva lot more objective on this issue than the Chinese companies that profit from it. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:04 pm by Kevin
This gentleman has not been paying any attention to the news at all, because (1) he too remains unaware that trying to escape by water is pointless, and (2) he either did not know, or forgot, that the waterways in southwestern Florida have recently been plagued by toxic algae blooms. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
In a chapter 13 case (called a “reorganization”), you keep all your property, and pay a portion or all of your debts in installments over a period of three to five years.How a Bankruptcy Can Help YouAn Immediate Stop of Foreclosures, Evictions, Repossessions, Utility Shut-Offs, Garnishments, and Other Creditor Actions. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Callens: ‘I do believe that there is a lot of political will in Germany to quickly ratify after the judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:17 am by Randy Barnett
Day 2, Part II (1:04:32 – responding to Senator Cornyn on "extraordinary circumstances under which the Supreme Court would revisit precedent"): Well, Brown v. [read post]