Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 341 - 360
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2008, 1:04 pm
But what I found particularly interesting and insightful were the comments Court of Appeals Judge Painter offered in a concurring opinion:It is a scary thought that someone could go to jail for posting a comment on the Internet. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:16 am
” Justice Pfeifer dissented on the ground that the Court never should have accepted this case, which is of no public or general interest. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Baccala (Conn. 2017) (calling a store manager a "fat ugly bitch," and worse, and saying, "fuck you, you're not a manager," were not "fighting words" under facts of the case); People in the Interest of R.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:42 am
See R.C. 5751.42. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:51 am
Motors Corp., after questions about the constitutionality of R.C. 4123.93 and 4123.931 were raised. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
Darling, the court held that the specification required the State to show that the school “was operating as a school pursuant to the standards set by the State of Ohio School Board pursuant to R.C. 3301.07. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
One problem: the statute provides for a one-year period; the injunction wasn’t renewed after that, so the court holds that Harris had a privacy interest. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
” That’s interesting phrasing in the opinion; no gun was in fact found. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:00 am
At trial, the jury awarded over $26.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages to the defendants for their counterclaims of unfair competition (which was premised on a theory that the underlying litigation was malicious and in bad faith), intentional interference, and defamation; the judgment has swelled to $40 million with interest and attorneys fees. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
The inference is because an offender receives a quantity of drugs, that offender is inferred to have violated the elements of R.C. 2925.03(A)(2). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:41 am
Laws 12-7-20 (arrestee “shall be afforded, as soon after being detained as practicable, not to exceed one hour from the time of detention, the opportunity to make use of a telephone for the purpose of securing an attorney or arranging for bail”; call may be confidential) As always, I’m interested in readers’ thoughts and experiences. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
The more interesting aspect of the opinion is the treatment of the dismissal of the indictment. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm
R.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
When such an admission is given, the advisements required by R.C. 2943.031 must be given. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
The parties have two children, R.C., born on August 3, 1994, and S.C., born on 14 February 1998. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) R.C. 2901(A)(11) (Definition of “law enforcement officer”) R.C. 2151.421 Reporting Child Abuse or Neglect (G) (“the public children services agency shall investigate . . . each report of child abuse or child neglect . . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
R.11 and R.C. 2943.031, was insufficient to establish that manifest injustice standard. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 6:20 am
See Ohio Revised Code § R.C. 2921.01(A). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Sheward, 86 Ohio St. 3d 451 (1999) (Plaintiff may bring an action without satisfying traditional standing requirements in the rare and extraordinary instance where the public interest is at stake; outlining public-right doctrine.) [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Guardian had a piece “National security being used to stifle public interest journalism, former judges warn”. [read post]
