Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 341 - 360
of 396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
Singleton, remanded the case for a sentencing hearing “for the limited purpose of the proper imposition of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
Well, that’s where it gets interesting. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Justice LahotiThe Bench comprising Justice Thomas, Justice Mohapatra and Justice R.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
One problem: the statute provides for a one-year period; the injunction wasn’t renewed after that, so the court holds that Harris had a privacy interest. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:13 pm
This Court therefore narrowly holds that R.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:24 am
Bean is more interesting. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Being in Pennsylvania, for quite some time we’ve had more than a passing interest in this section of the Third Restatement and its essentially negligence (“reasonableness”)-based theory of product liability. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:46 am
Here is an interesting state case out of the 12th Appellate District of Ohio, Ohio v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE INTEREST OF J.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Gardner’s contention that this court may set aside the procedural rules of the PCRA in the interests of justice and are unpersuaded that the interests of justice require us to engage in the scope of review that he requests. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
” A shortage in one of the key drugs used for lethal injections, has lead to some interesting new challenges, see, e.g. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:25 pm
The Ohio statute containing the rules for driving in marked lanes is R.C. 4511.33. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
Gondor, 112 Ohio St.3d 377, 2006-Ohio-6679, 860 N.E.2d 77, ¶ 47 (noting that courts construe statutes establishing postconviction relief narrowly to uphold the societal interest in final judgments). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:42 am
See, e.g., R.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
Hmmm, could be interesting, I thought. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
In a recent New Jersey unpublished Appellate Division case, R.C. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
Law Lessons from R.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled 7-0 today that pursuant to R.C. 1343.02, when a debtor defaults on a written instrument that specifies an interest rate payable on the unpaid balance, and there is no agreement of the parties or another statutory provision expressly authorizing the compounding of interest, the creditor is entitled to simple interest on the unpaid amount until payment is made. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
A trial court may not, however, simply ignore the requirements of R.C. 2317.02(B). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
Also of relevance is Stuart Graham's individual interest as co-author. [read post]
