Search for: "In the Interest of EM" Results 341 - 360 of 2,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 4:03 am by Jon Gelman
If employer fraud is not enough, the system is constantly undergoing abuse from business interests, ie. medical provo\iders, who abuse the system. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:22 am by Douglas A. Berman
As part of its new editorial series in support of repealing marijuana prohibition (basics here), the New York Times has this fascinating page titled "Evolving on Marijuana," which provides key quotes from key editorials about marijuana law and policy over the last 50 years. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
The post A Final Word on Rebuilding Expertise (and <em>Rebuilding Expertise</em>), by William Araiza appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Nicholas Bagley
The post <em>Chevron</em> deference at stake in fight over payme [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am by Amy Howe
The lower courts ruled for the state, but in 2016 the Supreme Court threw out those rulings, holding that the lower courts had misconstrued the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, a federal law governing the National Park Service’s authority over lands in Alaska. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:04 am by Jonathan B. Miller
Ct. 2292 (2016) The post Symposium: <em>June Medical</em> should be summarily reversed appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm by Lincoln Caplan
The post Justice Breyer and <em>Parents Involved</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm by Douglas Laycock and Thomas Berg
And this is apparently an absolute rule; the court does not consider whether hostility might be justified by some state interest, compelling or otherwise. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:17 pm by Rory Little
The post Opinion analysis: A DIG in <em>Vogt</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am by Daniel Hemel
The post Argument analysis: Hating on <em>Chevron</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am by Mark Rienzi
Such laws are classic examples of content and viewpoint discrimination, and they would only be sustainable if the relevant government body could satisfy strict scrutiny and prove that it has no less restrictive way to serve a compelling government interest. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 11:33 am by David Friedman
Duke Morgen gave ‘em to me–didn’t even know the Prince was in the keep till he stood up to guarantee ‘em. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
Thus, in order to limit campaign contributions and expenditures, the federal government must point to a substantial governmental interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
” Any potential convention should explicitly include a malicious intent standard, should not transform corporate or government computer use policies into criminal liability, should provide a clearly articulated and expansive public interest defense, and include clear provisions that allow security researchers to do their work without fear of prosecution. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:51 am
”  The court held that the State of Hawaii was the real party in interest because it “has a specific, concrete interest in protecting its citizens and economy from false, unfair and deceptive practices related to prescription drugs[,]” and some forms of the relief sought, such as civil penalties, were not available to individual consumers. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Robert Chesney
  But there actually is an interesting change, one I certainly should have noticed the first time through. [read post]