Search for: "In the Matter of Jackson"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 8:52 pm
Did these facts matter to the majority? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
As a general matter, the plaintiff gets to decide where to sue a defendant. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In so holding, the Court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, the Court primarily focused on the bakery owner's religious objections but deliberately avoided ruling on the matter of free speech. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
I will admit that I have not spent significant time with Justice Thomas’s concurrence or Justice Jackson’s dissent. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
” Jackson also indicated that she would have granted review in Lombardo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
Thus, the majority's decision not to take up this matter is doubly unfortunate. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
He explained that Colorado cannot “force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
"Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance," Gorsuch added.Gorsuch's majority opinion was joined by the court's Republican-appointed justices, while liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
This fact underlies our cases involving everything from movie producers to book publishers to newspapers....In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
Under Colorado's logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic—no matter the underlying message—if the topic somehow implicates a customer's statutorily protected trait. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Thankfully, Justice Jackson in particular did highlight some of those benefits. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
None of this matters much if you think universities should be given broad discretion to use racial preferences, so long as it is for seemingly good motives. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:29 am
If you have questions as to whether an H-1B amended petition is necessary, please reach out to your Jackson Lewis attorney. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
This distinction matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:27 am
Chris Jackson and Annaleise Azevedo Lohr report for Ipsos. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
Kagan wrote the majority opinion joined by Roberts, Alito, Kavanaugh and Jackson. [read post]
