Search for: "In the Matter of a Motion to Compel"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2023, 3:51 am
Defendants’ remaining arguments relating to damages are not persuasive on [*2]this 3211 motion. [read post]
18 May 2023, 11:30 am
As Chief Justice Wagner of the Supreme Court of Canada recently identified, the chronic underfunding of our courts is causing delay in civil and criminal matters. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:48 pm
The federal district court granted Uber’s motions to compel arbitration. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am
The Court of Appeals explained that the “matter [came to it] on a motion to dismiss, not a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:44 am
Got a hearing coming up on a motion? [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:09 am
In so doing, the Court applied and explained numerous principles governing both motions for intervention as of right and motions for permissive intervention. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Zurn found that “a careful reading of Corwin’s text and other authorities compels the conclusion that Corwin was not intended to cleanse a claim to enjoin a defensive measure under Unocal enhanced scrutiny. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:57 pm
The trial court granted Kaufman’s anti-SLAPP motion and ultimately awarded him $219,269.25 in attorneys’ fees. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
But that was only the beginning rather than the end of the matter. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that, where, as here, a proceeding is in "the nature of mandamus to compel, it [is] required to have been commenced within four months after the refusal by [the] respondent, upon the demand of [the] petitioner, to perform its duty", citing Matter of Speis v Penfield Cent. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that, where, as here, a proceeding is in "the nature of mandamus to compel, it [is] required to have been commenced within four months after the refusal by [the] respondent, upon the demand of [the] petitioner, to perform its duty", citing Matter of Speis v Penfield Cent. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
No matter their academic background, all good journalists have hungry minds. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:38 am
The court found the officer had a “reasonable opportunity” to observe the speed of defendant’s vehicle, and any question about the credibility of the officer’s testimony was one for the jury, not a matter of admissibility. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:59 am
If you are a defendant who has hired a private Fort Lauderdale criminal defense lawyer to represent you in the pending matter, you’re most likely paying by the hour. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
” Notably, Judge Donato expressed obvious dismay at the fact that Google “chose to stay silent until compelled to speak by the filing of the Rule 37 motion and the Court’s intervention. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
” Notably, Judge Donato expressed obvious dismay at the fact that Google “chose to stay silent until compelled to speak by the filing of the Rule 37 motion and the Court’s intervention. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
” Notably, Judge Donato expressed obvious dismay at the fact that Google “chose to stay silent until compelled to speak by the filing of the Rule 37 motion and the Court’s intervention. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part the order denying Uber’s motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:21 am
Job Killer Bills The job killer bills scheduled for consideration this week are: SB 365 (Wiener; D-San Francisco): Discriminates against use of arbitration agreements by requiring trial courts to continue trial proceedings during any appeal regarding the denial of a motion to compel, undermining arbitration and divesting courts of their inherent right to stay proceedings.SB 399 (Wahab; D-Hayward): Chills employer speech regarding religious and political matters,… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Defense counsel instructed corporate counsel to decline to answer based upon attorney-client privilege, Eric’s counsel marked 13 questions for a ruling, and a motion to compel ensued. [read post]
