Search for: "Ip v. C. I. R" Results 341 - 360 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Ringer, 579 F.2d 294, 297 (4th Cir. 1978).See, for example, Adobe Systems v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
 Last week the IPKat reported on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-462/09 Thuiskopie v Opus. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Gray on Claims) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Pet-door patent dispute over jurisdiction clarified: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
I am not an IP attorney so I rarely comment here on litigation (threatened or otherwise) involving patents, but this one is worth mentioning because it may be of interest to many of you even if, like me, you don't have a deep knowledge of patent law. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele 2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
(TechnoLlama) France Web 2.0 companies in France challenge data retention law in court (IP Osgoode) Germany BGH: Hyperlinks, freedom of expression and copyright infringing software – I ZR 191/08 (IPKat) India Delhi High Court grants order in favour of UTV Software Communications restraining cable operators from distributing movie ‘Thank You’ (Spicy IP) Italy Italian court orders all ISPs to block BTjunkie (TorrentFreak) Sweden Pirate Bay becomes… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm by Marie Louise
Lime Group LLC (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California smacks down lawyer who tries to enforce copyright in 23 word email: Stern v. [read post]