Search for: "Ives v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 7,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Member States aim for total consensus on the draft convention's text. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
I was discussing the specifics of Florida state law — not what federal law (or, for that matter, any other state’s law) requires or permits. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
IV. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
The decision in Ensygnia v Shell is a fresh warning, if one was needed, of the substantial risks of description amendments. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
I removed the State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
” Sanders v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV), vacating certain portions of 45 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
IV. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:59 am
In Biden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:48 am
Flexible working requests must (i) be in writing, (ii) be dated, (iii) state that it is a statutory request, (iv) specify the change sought and when the employee wants it to take effect, (v) explain what impact the change would have on the employer and how it could be dealt with and (vi) state whether a previous application has been made and when. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Earlier today, I submitted an amicus brief to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
V. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Also informative are emerging state and local efforts to regulate AI, including increased interest from state attorneys general seeking concurrent enforcement authority with any federal regulatory regime for AI and dozens of state-level legislative proposals, focused on the use of AI in various contexts. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Woods Tr. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
” The FAST Act defined a “Fast Food Restaurant” as a restaurant that (i) provides food or beverages, (ii) for immediate consumption on or off the restaurant’s premises; (iii) to customers who order and pay for items prior to eating; (iv) with items sold or prepared in advance, including items that may be prepared in bulk and kept hot, or items that can be prepared or heated quickly; and (v) with limited or no table service. [read post]
