Search for: "J. Collins" Results 341 - 360 of 1,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 10:04 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Symposium: A Special Tribute to Andreas LowenfeldLinda J. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
I'm not sure how Maine's Republican Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins would take to that advice. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:27 am by Yosi Yahoudai
[embedded content] The post Ed Dwight, America’s 1st Black astronaut candidate, becomes oldest person in space appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 5 July 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the the  privacy case of GUH v KYT [2021] EWHC 1854 (QB). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Brown Wendy Collins Perdue, What’s “Sovereignty” Got to Do with It? [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:47 pm by CJLF Staff
California Senate to Vote on Counties Opting Out of Secure Communities: Michael J. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:56 am
Earlier this week, I mentioned that Ethan, Jennifer Collins and I have completed a working draft of our paper, Punishing Family Status, and have shipped it off to a number of law reviews. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:58 am by Christine Branstad
” Summer Reads for Businesses in Iowa: Cyber Law: A Legal Arsenal for Online Business – Brett J. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 20 January Collins Rice J handed down judgment in Riley v Sivier [2021] EWHC 79 (QB), striking out Mr Sivier’s defence of truth, honest opinion and publication on a matter of public interest in relation to the comments, but it was struck out. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Baker J said that O’Flaherty J in the Supreme Court in Heaney (above) dealt with the right to silence as a corollary of freedom of expression “by reference to Article 40.3.1”, whereas he in fact dealt with it by reference to Article 40.6. [read post]