Search for: "J. Grant"
Results 341 - 360
of 17,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Mehta and Kaitlyn Box, Apr. 1, 2024 "On March 25, 2024 Chief Justice J. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 8:40 am
This process typically grants a complete discharge of eligible debts, giving the person a clean slate. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
" [Hats off to Saher J. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
., J.), the court granted a Defendant’s Motion to Compel a Plaintiff to provide information to the IME doctor during an independent medical examination of a Plaintiff in a personal injury case arising out of a motor vehicle accident.According to the decision, the Plaintiff had appeared for an examination but refused to answer the IME doctor’s questions, asserting that the questions were allegedly outside the scope of Pa. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
As a result, the Court granted summary judgment to the United States, ending the case (at least at this level). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
The New York State Legislature, for example, meticulously guarded the state’s sovereignty–an approach worthy of further review given that other states later emulated New York’s regulation of churches.[12] The legislature forced all churches, including the most wealthy and prominent denominations, to have their charters renewed or granted.[13] For some, this was far from a perfunctory process but rather involved the legislature passing legislation… [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 2:27 pm
Wanda J. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:03 am
” Id. at 20 (Riggs, J., dissenting). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
March 1, 2024 Nealon, J.). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something more to… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
The case addressed the validity of a patent granted to Edwin L. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:53 am
Valentine & Frank J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
But as Daniel J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
The district court granted the agency’s motion to dismiss the suit as time-barred, the court of appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari as to section 2401(a). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
“The defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”) (hereinafter Geico) retained the defendants Picciano & Scahill, LLP, and Gilbert J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
On 20 to 22 March 2024, a three-day hearing took place before Fancourt J in the High Court to determine whether the claimants in the NGN unlawful information gathering case would be granted permission to amend their claim. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:36 pm
According to the court, “[j]ust because a medication is subject to multiple legal requirements does not make it impossible to comply with Act 1103. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:37 am
Section 10(j) itself empowers courts to grant court orders “as it deems just and proper. [read post]
