Search for: "JOHN DOE #1, an individual" Results 341 - 360 of 5,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
Greenhouse frames her argument as a contrast between two briefs–one by Sandra Cano (the former “Mary Doe” of Doe v. [read post]
While the latest version of the bill does require insurers to cover individuals with preexisting conditions, it removes the ACA requirement prohibiting insurers from charging higher rates to those individuals with preexisting conditions who allow their coverage to lapse. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
” Defendant argues that a fictitious name or a John Doe name is insufficient to identify anyone, and therefore is insufficient to identify anyone with particularity. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by scanner1
FERN HART, individually; MICHAEL KENNEDY, individually, and JANE and JOHN DOES 1-20, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
Does the CDC like tacos more than sandwiches? [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 2:38 am by SHG
  Via John Hochfelder, the Appellate Division, Second Department, holds that the jury that found for the plaintiff, Pedro Acosta (whose name isn't really Pedro Acosta, as if that's a big deal in Brooklyn) and awarded him $1 million for his damages was, well, nuts. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
Two books that I recently read: 1) Prime Obsession, by National Review's John Derbyshire. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Though Jane Doe had consented to have sex with one of the boys (hereinafter John Doe II), she was unaware that two other boys (hereinafter John Doe III and John Doe IV) had switched places with Doe II. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
In an order issued last Thursday, the 9th Circuit in John Doe #1 v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
You're wasting your time trying to convince the Board that your application for registration will stand.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm by Will Patton
”  The Secretary of State was poised to release the names, when a group named “Protect Marriage Washington” and two individual signatories to the referendum petition (John Doe #1 and #2) sought a preliminary injunction in Federal District Court to stop the release. [read post]