Search for: "JOHN DOE III" Results 341 - 360 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” But, he admonishes, Article III’s distinctive reference to “Controversies” does require adverse parties—in other words, when, in cataloguing the potential scope of federal court subject matter jurisdiction, Article III refers to “Cases” and “Controversies” separately, that is for good reason. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:10 am by Paul Lewis
This does not mean the United States should not detain new captures or no longer detain those confined at GTMO who are too dangerous to transfer. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:25 pm
The third solution is whether the joinder rule in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be interpreted so that these John Does cannot be joined into one lawsuit. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But Pfander does not answer why considerations of that sort must be housed in the “litigable interest” standard or, more broadly, in Article III. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) The government’s February 2010 cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Erin Miller
The following is an essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens by Sonja R. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:17 am by Ronald Mann
” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for a 6-3 majority in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The rest of Article II makes unmistakably clear that the President does not act alone. [read post]