Search for: "JOHNSON v. FINE" Results 341 - 360 of 585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 11:30 am
Here's a case where a Ninth Circuit panel whose prior opinion was summarily reversed by the Supreme Court says it'd be just fine were the Court to do so again.I was actually thinking last week about what a generally frivolous waste it is for litigants to file rehearing petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
(Emphasis added).3 Journalism’s role in fostering democracy may be somewhat obvious, but the fine arts play their role as well. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am by Don Cruse
ELBERT JOHNSON, No. 11-0933 Per Curiam This case is an application of PORT ELEVATOR-BROWNSVILLE, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A tenth person has been fined for naming a rape victim. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 4:40 am by Tessa Shepperson
I give an update on the important case of Johnson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Sentenced to six months house arrest and a fine of $10,000.United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
Houston Money Laundering Lawyer Charles Johnson will provide a vigorous defense of clients who have drawn scrutiny from the federal government for their financial transactions. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm by Law Lady
All of Vonnie Cornett's claims against Cordis and parent Johnson and Johnson are untimely under Kentucky law and, secondarily, even if they were timely, most are preempted by Riegel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm by Law Lady
All of Vonnie Cornett's claims against Cordis and parent Johnson and Johnson are untimely under Kentucky law and, secondarily, even if they were timely, most are preempted by Riegel v. [read post]