Search for: "JOINT FEE APPLICANTS" Results 341 - 360 of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The fee of $40 per person will cover morning coffee, lunch and an afternoon reception. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The first intervener paid the opposition fee and the appeal fee and requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked in its entirety. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 2:44 am by Andrew Trask
Thirteen more complaints were filed, and the US Attorney's office (EDNY) and SEC launched a joint investigation of the firm. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Francis Pileggi
Bioveris soon thereafter filed an action seeking seeking monetary damages for the remaining balance owed for its interest in the joint venture, appointment of a representative to the joint venture’s board, and legal fees. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:30 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Employees or applicants that can prove they were subjected to prohibited disability discrimination under the ADA generally can recover actual damages, attorneys’ fees, and up to $300,000 of exemplary damages (depending on the size of the employer). [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He lost money (the excess money he paid for each minute below the promised 50) or property (each minute of calling time below 50 minutes) as a result of failure to disclose the applicable fees and charges. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:26 am by Victoria Sweet
 Beginning on June 1, 2016, new or renewing members of the NAICJA interested in joint membership will pay a $215 fee directly to NAICJA (existing NAICJA members should contact NAICJA directly for details on upgrading to a joint membership). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:52 pm by L. Gopika
Rajiv Choudhry wrote a post about the recent IPAB order that directed the patent office to accept a national  phase patent application that was originally filed with less fees. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 8:45 am by Dan Harris
Last week, in So You Think You Have a China WFOE or Joint Venture or Trademark: Do You Though? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
iPad App: iPad App: The folks at Cooper Legal have developed a Patent Portal App for searching for and viewing patents and patent applications. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The policy at issue here offered coverage only for claims by employees, former employees and applicants. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:28 am by Florian Mueller
In the alternative to specifying the license fees, the defendant may also offer a determination of those fees by the patentee subject to [judicial review for reasonableness under] Article 315 Civil Code. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
The BCICAC rules provide for the payment of fees upon the commencement of an arbitration and state (in rule 10) that “the arbitration is deemed to have commenced when the Arbitration Notice or Joint Submission has been filed with the Centre and the commencement fee paid. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 7:16 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The BCICAC rules provide for the payment of fees upon the commencement of an arbitration and state (in rule 10) that “the arbitration is deemed to have commenced when the Arbitration Notice or Joint Submission has been filed with the Centre and the commencement fee paid. [read post]
 The goal for the proposed EPMs is to improve the quality of care provided to beneficiaries in an applicable episode while reducing episode spending through financial accountability. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:50 pm by admin
In this regard, there is no express Competition Act exemption for voluntary trade or professional association which are, generally speaking, subject to the application of the Competition Act, unless they have the benefit of other federal or provincial legislative authorization for joint negotiation (and therefore may have the benefit of the regulated conduct defence). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]