Search for: "Jackson v. Barrett" Results 341 - 360 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Jackson asks Ellsworth about the problems of judges reviewing expert agencies. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
By Laury Oaks During the Supreme Court oral arguments for Dobbs v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Kagan was able to attract Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett (who also joined the majority opinion) but the three in the majority who didn’t seem to want to be associated with Kagan’s content were Thomas, Roberts, and Jackson (an interesting trio). [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm by Ilya Somin
Jackson Women's Health Organization, which raises that very issue. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:38 am by Unknown
Justices explored whether Item 303 omissions require a misleading statement and if private rights of action are authorized in this context (Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm by Karen Pita Loor and Cassidy Heverling
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, in a decision joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, even liberal jurists now play the game, as now-Judge/Justice-to-be Jackson illustrated last month. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Jackson Women's Health Organization, Justice Barrett asked the Mississippi Solicitor General, "Would a decision in your favor call any of the questions--any of the cases, sorry, that Justice Sotomayor is identifying into question? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts announces the slightly surprising lineup that includes a concurrence by Jackson and a dissent by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
A recent invocation of this faulty logic occurred in Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s questions during the November 2021 oral arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]