Search for: "Jacobs v. Major" Results 341 - 360 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses “law and symbolism” at the Court and argues that the “majority got it right” with its ruling last week in Walker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
He didn't mention the RIAA and the major record labels but few in the audience can have been unaware of the unstated criticism. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
This is part two of a two-part interview with Ilya Somin about his new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
Court of Appeal Overturning the High Court’s decision by a 2-1 majority, the Court of Appeal (per Longmore LJ and Sir Robin Jacob) held that the restrictions issued by JKX were valid and had not been imposed for an ‘improper purpose’. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  The book describes the litigation in Kelo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
Future generations of liberal jurists might eventually prefer the views of Jane Jacobs, Ralph Nader, and the NAACP, over those of the Kelo majority. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:59 pm by Rich Vetstein
” So the Justices effectively punted on the major question that everyone has been waiting on for a year now. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jeremy Jacob of Greenwire and Bradley McAllister for JURIST. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court failed to consider all of the evidence in the record in granting the employer’s summary judgment motion, and impermissibly “credited the evidence of the employer—the party seeking summary judgment—and failed to properly acknowledge key evidence offered by the party opposing that motion,” the appeals court had found (Jacobs v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He views the goal of neoliberalism, by contrast, as cultivating education that prepares the student to be a reflexive supporter of the status quo, take orders uncritically, and accept consumerism as a major desire and goal in public and private life. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The fact that the media has latched on to that demonstrates how exceptional that is v. common fannish gift economies. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
  Jeremy Jacobs reports for Greenwire that “[a] majority of the justices held that Nebraska knowingly violated an interstate compact governing the river, depriving Kansas of water that should have flowed over the states’ border. [read post]