Search for: "James Powers" Results 341 - 360 of 10,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 9:07 am by Bob Ambrogi
Crispin Passmore moderated a panel on regulatory changes, with Catherine Kemnitz of Axiom, James Peters of LegalZoom, and Gareth Hunt of Stifel. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:20 am by Robert Kraft
Be sure to always keep your car well maintained and make use of automatic gears, larger mirrors, sensors, and power steering/brakes if possible. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
“Under international humanitarian law, the place where you evacuate people to must, by law, have sufficient resources for their survival — medical facilities, food and water,” said James Elder, a spokesperson for the United Nations Children’s Fund. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
No international power can be responsible for this. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Udit Mahalingam
Section 9(2) of the 2002 Act provides that the Secretary of State may give guidance about any matter relating to the exercise of his licensing power, and Section 9(3) provides that the Secretary of State must give guidance about the general principles to be followed when exercising any such licensing power. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Claims by antitrust enforcers that they should have stronger antitrust law to enforce (and more power to interpret antitrust law) should be viewed not through the lens of economics but instead through the lens of the political and constitutional order. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
Banksy once spoke on this, saying, “As soon as I cut my first stencil, I could feel the power there. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
Under the bias doctrine, the power to deprive someone of a life, liberty, or property interest can't be vested in someone who is biased—especially financially self-interested—in the exercise of that power. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Jennifer González
” Additionally, the doctrine served as a warning to European powers against interfering with the newly independent Latin American states. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Adithi Iyer
James Toomey, who previously wrote on a similar topic on this forum, expands on the “reach” of property law as applied to biomatter in Property’s Boundaries. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
No Private Separation-of-Powers Doctrine Now for the recipient-based theories. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:03 am by Beatrice Yahia
North Korea said it launched the satellite last week, which “propelled the country into a new era of space power,” state-run news agency KCNA said. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am by Tom Joscelyn
Our previous analysis provides additional reasons that Chesebro’s reported description of the Dec. 16 meeting with Trump warrants scrutiny.[3] As part of his false electors scheme, Chesebro argued that the Vice President should assume powers that are clearly not granted by the Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am by Sasha Volokh
Delegations of power aren't wrong as such—only delegations of legislative power. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:37 pm
The NLJ has When Supreme Court Pros Came Calling, Client Stuck With Local Lawyer -- "I think there’s something romantic about the idea that a small-town lawyer could argue their way all the way up to the Supreme Court," James Freed said of his attorney, Victoria Ferres.A 34-year-old graduate of Michigan State University College of Law, Victoria Ferres never imagined when she returned home to practice law and help with her mother’s health issues that she would… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
In this first-of-its-kind JURIST “global dispatch” on a single topic, 15 law students and young lawyers from around the world, all of them JURIST correspondents from outside of Israel and Palestine, join together to offer a  panoramic view of how the current Gaza conflict is unfolding in their countries and regions. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:03 am by Mark Graber
”  Bingham objected, pointed out that that language “clothes the civic courts with the power to remove any officer from office, the President not accepted. [read post]