Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
Today the justices granted review in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:52 am
The Ninth Circuit case is Holman v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:49 am
” (Aldoo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
United States, No. 16-3118, U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
The injunction is sweeping in that it applies to all potential countries to which the United States might transfer Doe, Burnham explains—not only the two countries with which the U.S. is actually negotiating. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Synthes United States Products, LLC, NO. 2:2015-cv-00295, 2015 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
It's very hard to imagine that the Delaware Supreme Court would not understand the serious implications of extraterritorial overreach.I remember a conference in Munich a few years ago where Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington--who shaped U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 9:40 am
County of Dutchess, 10 CV 4917, which was brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:29 am
Mize and Gregg are listed as the only parents on the child's birth certificate.Under Sec. 301 of the INA, a person born outside the United States to two married U.S. citizens is a U.S. citizen if at least one of the parents has resided in the U.S. at any time. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:23 pm
United States, aka the "Kids Climate Case," by granting the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint, some two years after the motion was filed. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 10:49 am
That's a lot of spam.My in box thanks you, United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Kotuby, Jr & James A. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
