Search for: "Jane Doe 1 and 2" Results 341 - 360 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 3:50 am by Fauzan Siddiqui
While the plaintiff was talking to a store employee there were two other customers behind him (referred to as John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2). [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe, defendant Jane Doe had filed a Title IX complaint against fellow Tulane student John Doe: Both Jane and another student (not a party to the case), Sue Roe, had "reported having consensual sex with [John], falling asleep, and waking up to him engaging in sexual activity. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
BELL From January 2007 to June 2007, Jane Doe worked for an answering service in Temecula. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
Here is what the prosecution - the State - argued on that issue:The evidence at trial shows that the computers which generated Exhibits 1 and 2 are programmed to automatically log and compile a record of calls made to or from a certain number. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 8:08 am by John H Curley
Such a conclusion, however, is contrary to the plain language of Article XXXIII, which expressly lays out the County's dual pre-transfer obligations to the Union: (1) attempted placement of employees and (2) at least thirty days' notice. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm by Lawrence Solum
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:37 pm
Suppose that this Congress had the following two intentions: (1) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, and (2) Congress intended that the equal protection clause should not prohibit segregation of the public schools. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The lab that identifies the drugs does not provide the item’s overall weight, but a Houston DEA official said that 7.5:1 ratio is consistent with the amount of the two drugs they seize. [read post]