Search for: "Jane Doe v. Jane Doe I" Results 341 - 360 of 725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Strujan v Tepperman & Tepperman, LLC. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 30211(U); January 28, 2011; Sup Ct, New York County ;Docket Number: 401164/2010 ;Judge: Jane S. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
A copy of the filed complaint can be referenced below: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS JANE DOE, as mother and next friend of JOHN DOE, a minor, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am by emagraken
Hamilton Wentworth, supra, or manifested in other decisions such as Jane Doe, Mooney, orSchacht. [414] I thus conclude the relationship at issue does not sustain sufficient proximity to found a duty of care. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
In Anonymous Rape Kits Not About Problems With Rape Victims posted at abyss2hope: A rape survivor's zigzag journey into the open, I discuss the so-called Jane Doe rape kits which are mandated beginning in 2009 by the federal Violence Against Women Act. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
I don’t expect Canadian courts to articulate a whole new set of criteria to replace the Banks v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
The default rule excluding hearsay is, as I again noted in that post, based on simple fairness: If hearsay weren't excluded, Jane Doe could take the stand at Sam Smith's trial for murder and tell the jury that Stan Ford had told her (Jane) that Sam committed the murder Sam's on trial for. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Dr Jane Denoncourt (Chair EIPTN, Conference Convenor and Senior Lecturer at Nottingham Law School) reports on the event. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Once I had the chance to read about it and to compare it to the information I had provided in my PGP profile page, I concluded with about 99.9% certainty that I was not among those who had been re-identified by [read post]