Search for: "Jim Winner"
Results 341 - 360
of 578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 4:28 am
Several disgruntled non-award-winners appeared to be contemplating discrimination claims against Michael and/or the company. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Not only do few of the applicable statutes provide for a private right of action, but even fewer allow the winner to receive attorneys’ fees from the loser. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:26 am
(Honorable mention: Jim Fregosi. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:52 pm
(Past recipients, including legal historians Jim Ely and Carol Rose,are here.) [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:22 am
http://t.co/nbDiNu9 (Jim Ericson) How to Manage ESI to Rein In Runaway Costs - http://t.co/l4gZgrM (Dennis Kiker) In Defense of Genger, Part II - http://tinyurl.com/3hag7dn (Christopher Spizzirri) Information Governance’s Next Frontier: Social Media Data – http://tinyurl.com/3uacxek (Beth Stackpole) Insourcing or Outsourcing eDiscovery? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:22 am
http://t.co/nbDiNu9 (Jim Ericson) How to Manage ESI to Rein In Runaway Costs - http://t.co/l4gZgrM (Dennis Kiker) In Defense of Genger, Part II - http://tinyurl.com/3hag7dn (Christopher Spizzirri) Information Governance’s Next Frontier: Social Media Data – http://tinyurl.com/3uacxek (Beth Stackpole) Insourcing or Outsourcing eDiscovery? [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:13 pm
" E.S Browning and Jim Carlton, "Apple Still Hobbled Despite Write-Down," Wall Street Journal, March 29, 1996. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
.: Arte Publico Press, c2010 HV8699.U5 A7713 2010 See Catalog Capitalism -- United States WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER, AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS / JACOB S. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
.: Arte Publico Press, c2010 HV8699.U5 A7713 2010 See Catalog Capitalism -- United States WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER, AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS / JACOB S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
The Sac Valley Section is holding its 1st Annual Summer Scholarship Fundraiser—join hosts John Dangberg, Larry Mintier, Jim Harnish, Janet Ruggiero, and David Mogavero in supporting the next generation of planners. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
Mark Boster, Los Angeles Times This is Jim Nakano, also known as the Donut Man. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:43 am
For those interested, the full vote tally is here.UPDATE: IBD on the vote:How is it that the party loudly proclaiming how the government shouldn’t “pick winners and losers” could only manage to get 34 senators to oppose one of the most egregious examples of federal industrial policy? [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:59 am
They commissioned work by famous economists, such as Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz, which argued that Fannie was not a serious risk to the taxpayer, countering “critics who argued that both Fannie and Freddie posed significant risks to the taxpayer. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:14 pm
In 1981, Janet Cooke’s selection as the winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Writing helped to reveal that she had made up her story about Jimmy, an 8-year-old heroin addict. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:40 am
Several disgruntled non-award-winners appeared to be contemplating discrimination claims against Michael and/or the company. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:21 am
When agencies coordinate there will be winners and there will be losers. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
I have no doubt that Jim Dedman and the rest of the crew over at Abnormal Use will someday find themselves in the illustrious company of Whoopi Goldberg, Liza Minelli and Barbra Streisand. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:45 am
Several disgruntled non-award-winners appeared to be contemplating discrimination claims against Michael and/or the company. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
Even if the transportation infrastructure is itself not entirely self-financing, growth in the aggregate economy makes the city the long-run winner. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:34 am
Not that I'm against non-quantifiable "trends" or anything, but one might have thought that Stewart, a former editor at the Wall Street Journal and Pulitzer Prize winner, might have considered the possibility that when people are not charged with an underlying crime, but only for lying, it doesn't reflect an increase in lying but an increase in prosecuting people for not telling the government what it wants to hear.One(?) [read post]
