Search for: "John Doe T" Results 341 - 360 of 22,801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although he made a strong argument, I share the widespread view among observers that the Supreme Court will reverse the Colorado Supreme Court and allow Trump’s name to appear on the ballot.The Dog that Probably Won’t BarkOne rationale on which the Supreme Court probably will not rely is the claim by Trump’s lawyers (and a few scholars) that Trump is not barred from the Presidency because Section 3’s ineligibility provision does not apply to the Presidency. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
The lawyers at oral argument said it would not apply because Colorado law does not embrace non-mutual collateral estoppel, but that answer (even if accurate) wouldn’t address Justice Alito’s bigger concern if another state besides Colorado (whose law does embrace non-mutual collateral estoppel) were to do what Colorado had done. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:13 am by Berry Law
What does this mean and how do you know if you qualify? [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
On August 6, 1787, the Committee of Detail reported on a draft provision in which Congress had the power "[t]o Appoint a Treasurer by ballot[.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does that preempt his state law claim that Roundup caused his cancer? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
" Jackson continued, "But the word 'president or vice president' does not … appear specifically in that list. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Berry Law
The VA does not have a clear process in place to handle these claims and often denies benefits to Veterans facing these medical conditions. [read post]
Dressed like Hollywood cowboys, Bezos and Sanchez harkened back to imagery of American film icons such as John Wayne and Clint Eastwood. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
During about two hours of arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts and the high court’s other conservative justices peppered the lawyers representing Trump’s challengers with a series of questions that suggested they were seeking a way to side with the former president – most likely based on reasoning that doesn’t address the question of whether he is or isn’t an insurrectionist. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:24 am by Marc Misthal
Malcom’s indictment of John Hammond and InGen applies with equal force to the burgeoning use of AI: “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should. [read post]