Search for: "John Does 1-4" Results 341 - 360 of 6,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2021, 3:10 am
" Something else we've enjoyed — also distinctly un-couples-y — are the 2 "With John" HBO shows:1. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm by OK Blawg Editor - James Dee Graves
JOHN DOE, Defendant.Case Number: O-2004-1175COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 1; 127 P.3d 1135; 2006 Okla. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Rory Little
Meanwhile, Rule 4(a) permits but does not require parties to file cross-appeals, and otherwise addresses only timing. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:01 am
A 1-4 start is not what new Cougar coach Kevin Sumlin had in mind as his introduction to the Houston sports community. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
So, when I got to Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, it initially made some sense to me, and I could envision its appeal to many others. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:28 am
Johns-Putra does a great job explaining this one, which really does require a full explanation: I confess I used to find this one amusing. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm
"That's the voiceover on this new Obama ad:A list of thoughts:1. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Savarese is a partner in the Litigation Department of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumMark Tushnet  For quite a while I’ve been irritated by the aphorism that “it takes a Theory to beat a Theory” in constitutional law and interpretation.[1]It strikes me as the sort of false profundity that gets thrown around in first-year college dormitories. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Doe, supra.This post only examines Doe’s challenge to the government’s having proved an essential element of the offense; it does not examine his argument regarding his sentence.The Court of Appeals appended this footnote to the first mention of “John Doe” in its opinion: “To the date of this writing the Defendant, who has refused to provide his name, has not been affirmatively identified and is referred to as `John… [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 3:46 am by Jon L. Gelman
The incidence of any psychiatric diagnosis in the 14 to 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis was 18⋅1% (95% CI 17⋅6–18⋅6), including 5⋅8% (5⋅2–6⋅4) that were a first diagnosis. [read post]