Search for: "John II Doe"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
" However, the credit card is the "physical embodiment of the services," and the design on the card will not be perceived as a mark for the services.In sum, the Board ruled that the tortoise shell design is not inherently distinctive and does not serve as a mark because:"(i) it is not unique or unusual in the field; (ii) it is a mere refinement of the common practice of using background designs on credit cards; and, (ii) it does not create a… [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:17 pm
It is time for John Demjanjuk to go home and face his past. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Baker II 151,000 150,005 0 5,000 306,005 Elaine L. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:13 pm
UPDATE: Reader John Coleman emails: The founders of Sirtris spoke to my class at Harvard Business School last week. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
John Harrison: Do Statutes Offering Pre-Enforcement Review Support Remand Without Vacatur? [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:45 am
This case law stems from the Decisions handed down by the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal on 25 March 2015 in cases G 2/12 and G2/13, which are nicknamed, respectively, “Tomatoes-II” and “Broccoli-II,” to distinguish them from “Tomatoes-I” (G 1/08 )and “Broccoli-I” (G 2/07). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
By John Filar AtwoodThe IPO market continues to put up numbers not seen since the dot-com era, including 85 deals in October. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm
Zink eventually largely prevailed on the substantive Public Records Act claims, after several different decisions of appellate courts and the state supreme court (including John Doe A and John Doe P II). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
Div. 1978) (on remand) (Lavene II)); John R. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:50 am
Such excessive deference is no more justified today than during World War II. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
[See the relevant portions of the articles here (Section VI) and here (Section II).] [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
In any event, it appears that Mueller does not share Barr’s view that facially valid uses of Article II (whatever those are exactly) can never be treated as criminal. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
Impeachment does not implicate federalism, and it is an inherently political process, as the Founders well understood. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
John kindly invited me to share a panel with him at the APRL meeting last Friday. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
"What does it mean when he says Sen. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
How does The Post select the best in legal blogging? [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:40 pm
In the war on terrorism, the bill of rights does not apply. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 2:26 pm
BALLOT Vote for three: X John Doe X Sister Jane Doe Barney Smith X Fred Jones QUESTION: Regarding married couples on the board, would this also apply to a brother and his sister, living in two townhomes situated right next to each other? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
Genachowski’s proposal is desperate because usually when a statute which confers agency jurisdiction becomes obsolete the agency asks Congress to update it, and if Congress thinks the agency does good work it will pass a new law. [read post]
