Search for: "Jones v. King*"
Results 341 - 360
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day, BlockShopper.com settle hyperlink trade mark… [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
Philip Jones’s new post complements those in L&RUK on the appointment of diocesan and suffragan bishops within the Church of England. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06584-20 Fair Play for Women v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 02638-20 A woman v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 6 Children (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved0 IPSO mediation 01321-20 A Man v Sunday Life, 11 Victims of sexual assault… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Despite all the violence that marked the civil rights revolution, the methods championed by , together with the sweeping political victories of racial liberalism in the Martin Luther King's adaptation of Gandhi-like methods, together with the decisive and bipartisan electoral victories of the 1960s, gained a bipartisan "mandate from the People" for landmark statutes and judicial super-precedents that went far beyond the more formal principles of racial… [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
We mentioned the British Columbia case of Lawson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:19 am
In today’s case (Jones v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
(I say 'rightly or wrongly', because the central holding of those cases was not as broad as many thought at the time: see Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2006] UKHL 26, [2007] 1 AC 270, paras 86 et seq). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am
IPSO 01118-24 Barrowman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 03617-24 Senvardar v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies As aforementioned, on Friday 11 October 2024 there was a Statement in Open Court in the case of Vine v Barton KB-2024-000733. [read post]
