Search for: "Justice v. Justice"
Results 341 - 360
of 95,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499; [2012] WLR (D) 121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in… [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:37 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm
When the Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:34 pm
Arrest and Summons v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm
This means that the concurring opinion tempers the Court's ruling endorsing the fraud on the market presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases announced in the 1988 Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm
Not far behind would be Young v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
As Justice Scalia observed, the Court in Coleman v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
In Walker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm
McNeely, and the dissenting justices in Williams v. [read post]
17 Feb 2004, 2:47 pm
The Justice Department has filed a motion in the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to lift the stay in the case of US v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Scalia was the only Justice not to sign onto an opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:16 am
Finally, the justices granted review in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:17 am
Pugin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
Introduction Well before the implementation of the HRA, open justice was recognized as essential to ensure public scrutiny of the operation of the court system as well as provide information to the public (see Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417). [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 71 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Bucnys v Ministry of Justice, & other cases [2013] UKSC 71 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 71 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Bucnys v Ministry of Justice, & other cases [2013] UKSC 71 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:21 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 38 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:38 am
Just a few weeks ago, the Court decided in Arizona v. [read post]
