Search for: "Kaufman v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2008, 5:26 am
Show Notes (Total running time 24:19) 0:14 Jacob Kaufman and Omar Ha-Redeye introduce themselves 0:25 Jacob mentions Canadian Lawyer's listing of Law is Cool as the Top Ten of the Canadian Blawgosphere 0:52 Omar congratulates all the winners, as well as some honourable mentions on the site 0:58 Jacob comments on the word "Blawgosphere," and says it sounds like something out of Dr. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:37 pm
Oh wait, there is no constitutional right to education (Kadrmas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel defined to… [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:46 pm by Pamela Fasick
Justices Yegan and Perren concurred.Comment: The Court declined to apply Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
I think that I, at least, have been informally seeing some indication of this since even before 9-11 [added: ;others might well think, as Alan Kaufman does in the comments, that this is not really the case and even perhaps, KA speaking again and not Alan, that John is extrapolating too much from his personal experience in the Bush administration being opposed by military lawyers]. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:50 am
"The right of one charged with [a] crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours"-Gideon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
In making its determination, the Court analyzed the motion using the five factors set forth in Kaufman v. [read post]