Search for: "Keene v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am by Michael O'Hear
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), the Court relied on legislative history that seemed to indicate Congress was contemplating the use of generic offense categories. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Charon QC
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
In the United States such rights are an aspect of the tort of privacy – the so-called “right to publicity” (for a recent case on these see here). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm by Anna Christensen
  Lyle has also kept our readers up to date on election and civil rights laws, clarifying the fine points of cases like Citizens United and NAMUDNO v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm by Matthew Hill
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Food-related Illness and Death in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
 The case is Bruce McCandless v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
 If you are (i) seriously interested in regularly writing for a blog of good standing and high standards, (ii) thick-skinned enough to cope with criticism from readers and colleagues, (iii) very competent in terms of literacy, (iv) closely enough involved in patent dispute resolution to have something to say on a frequent basis and (v) based in a major patent litigating jurisdiction other than the United Kingdom, please email Jeremy here (subject line "PatLit")… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Rosalind English
This is illustrated by the outcome of the US Supreme Court case United States v Stevens which overturned a ban on animal snuff videos as being an unconstitutional restriction on content. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Food-related Illness and Death in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm by Rosalind English
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Trademark Office (PDF) Reply Brief for Petitioner Bernard L. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm by Adam Wagner
However, religious authorities have nowhere near the influence they have in other jurisdictions such as in the United States, as evidenced by the fact that the religious premises restriction has recently been removed by an amendment to the Equality Act 2010. [read post]