Search for: "Kerr v. United States District Court" Results 341 - 360 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
(Fla., 2016), the Florida Supreme Court declared unconstitutional, as a violation of due process under the Florida and United States constitutions, the provisions of 440.34 restricting fees to the statutory formula. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 am by SHG
Pickar, 616 F.3d 821, 827 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting United States v. [read post]
This brings us to … Error #2: A district court has no authority to bl [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  [UPDATE:  Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Murray v Raynor [2019] NSWCA 274 the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against an award of $120,000 made by the District Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed, that SeaWorld had violated OSHA’s general duty-clause. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am by Paul Cassell
  Any voluntary statements made by the suspect shall be admissible in any prosecution thereafter brought by the United States or by the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Amsterdam District Court has ordered Google to delist a formal reprimand which was given to a doctor. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
Lurger: How to Determine Foreign Legal Rules in Accelerated Proceedings in Austrian Courts In a rather lengthy proceeding initiated in 2014 in the district court Vienna Döbling the wife claimed maintenance from her husband. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am by Danielle Citron
Most importantly, the majority rejected application of either a broad “third party” rule from United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
What it had was a bench of three federal district court judges, all conservatives appointed by Republican Presidents. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) expanded its application of constitutional standards in the context of critical pre-trial processes in criminal matters, such as plea bargaining and discovery. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
 As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]