Search for: "Key v. Grant"
Results 341 - 360
of 8,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 11:40 am
From Laviage v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:55 pm
v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
The key takeaway for claimants and practitioners alike is th [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
[scribd id=52562392 key=key-26ihkat6mnncee11mtal mode=list] [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
In City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
In Jenkins v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:59 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:24 am
(Nokia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
” In other words he restrained the other non sexual information Following the key decisions of Campbell, Lord Browne and McKennitt, the judge held: “I would certainly grant an injunction in respect of ‘salacious details’ (to adopt Lord Hoffmann’s phrase), but I would go further and restrict the communication, with a view to publication to the media, of information as to intimate conversations or activities. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
The importance of providing full and frank disclosure in without notice applications was recently evidenced in the case of YXB v TNO ([2015] EWHC 826 (QB)) As a result of the claimant’s material non-disclosure, the High Court discharged orders granted in the claimant’s favour and denied a privacy injunction for the future. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:58 pm
Avoiding improper preemption is the key goal. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:14 am
A recent court case out of Georgia -- State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Rather than using the tests established in Gilbert which were applied in the previous decisions, Lord Sumption amalgamated tests used in various Scottish cases, including Bank of Scotland v Assessor for Edinburgh [1891] 18 R 936, Burn Steward Distillers plc v Lanarkshire Valuation Joint Board [2001] RA 110 and University of Glasgow v Assessor for Glasgow [1952] SC 504 to come up with a three pronged approach comprised of the key principles of (1) geography… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Clear With Computers, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am
But, as we have already said, confidentiality is not dependent upon locks and keys. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:23 am
On appeal, the defendants claim that the judgment must be reversed because the court incorrectly deprived them of the right to cross-examine the plaintiff's key witness at trial and thereafter refused to grant the defendants' request that the witness' testimony be stricken. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:53 am
" Kinglite Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
