Search for: "King v. Waters"
Results 341 - 360
of 487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am
Supreme Court decision (Brady v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Muddying the waters: United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
” Pamela King and Ellen Gilmer report at E&E News that the justices also “turned down a sweeping challenge to pipeline oversight and took no action on a closely watched Clean Water Act debate. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:21 am
Lynch, January 11, 2016, King, R.). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The Register has a post entitled “Mandarins plotted to water down EU data protection regs” which indicates that HMRC was hoping to put in place “exemptions” from GDPR. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
(King) (compelling arbitration based upon cruise line's agreement to waive choice of law provision); Gawin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Vitamins are divided into two groups based on their solubility in water. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Quality King: grey market goods. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
