Search for: "Kirk v Kirk" Results 341 - 360 of 739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by WSLL
Olson, Chief Appellate Counsel; and Kirk A. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
—Nathan McMurray | @LXBN - http://bit.ly/OHXKpt (Colin O'Keefe) Apple and Samsung take Australian Legal Battle to the 'Hot Tub' - http://bit.ly/PzKZft (Jane Wardell) Samsung: Apple Pushed Expert Witnesses to Change their Minds | Macworld - http://bit.ly/MrSLNS (Jeremy Kirk) Apple v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
We've suffered Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm by Patrick
along with Captain Kirk and her new blu-ray copy of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by WSLL
Olson, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:02 am by WSLL
Olson*, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
BNA provides an extensive summary of: Beltran v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:26 am by WSLL
Olson*, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:41 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although defendant's contention that the indictment was duplicitous on its face is not preserved for our review (see People v Becoats, 17 NY3d 643, 650-651), we nevertheless exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Bracewell, 34 AD3d 1197, 1198). .. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  I realize you’re both very busy and were it not important, I would not presume to take up any of your time, or the time of your advisers, but it has long since become clear that neither of your campaigns understands several of the key dynamics that will have a major impact on which one of you wins in November of 2012. [read post]