Search for: "LB v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Click here for Wednesday’s LB post; here for Thursday’s WSJ article. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Well, in Alexander-David v LB Hammersmith & Fulham, those good intentions (and property law) have bitten back. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:51 am
Moreover, this strategy -- going for the 800-lbs gorilla first, instead of low-hanging fruit -- is more evidence of a conscious decision not target bloggers, who are more likely to cause controversy.] [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:31 am by EPS
Never Rarely Occasionally FrequentlyLess than 10 lbs. __ __ __ __10 lbs. __ __ __ __20 lbs. __ __ __ __50 lbs. __ __ __ __k. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 3:09 pm
The defendant paid no proper regard to the stated vulnerability of the claimant. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:17 pm
(AP Photo/Nick Ut) As readers of the LB know, one of the top cases of the current Supreme Court term is Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
S 59 Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
“That is the question, easy to ask but not so easy to answer” - as it takes the Court of Appeal 40 pages (right before Christmas, thank you very much, hence this rather late note) to answer that question in R (A) v LB  Croydon; R (M) v LB Lambeth  [2008] EWCA Civ 1445  I’d have to agree. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Muse v London Borough of Brent [2008] EWCA Civ 1447 was an appeal arising from LB Brent’s decision to discharge duty under s.193 HA 1996 when Mrs Muse refused alternative accommodation offered when her current temporary accommodation (at Press House!) [read post]