Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER" Results 341 - 360 of 1,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
Publicly accessible livestreaming will ensure that the public, including less-resourced individuals and small businesses that so often face patent claims, has the information and facts often available only to select lawyers and their corporate clients,” said Moss.For EFF’s filing:https://www.eff.org/document/uniloc-v-apple-eff-motion-videoFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/uniloc-v-apple  Contact:  AlexMossMark Cuban Chair to Eliminate… [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 So, as with Corvid-19, we all have to hope for the best and ignore the fact that there may be relatively little we can do to avoid the pandemic. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am by Katharine Trendacosta
In practice, the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions have done little to stop "Internet piracy. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Peter Groves
Having commuted into London by train for so much of my life, I have long been familiar with the Brompton folding bicycle - the advantages of which it's a little hard to appreciate when the crowded train carriage is full (OK, that's hyperbole) of them. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The difference between popular impeachment and those undertaken by the state (on itself) is the authority of law; but if the authority of law (or its deployment) is itself the object of impeachment then the neutrality of law offers little protection against the strategies of politics. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6581963/Letter-From-President-Trump-Final.pdf  "You are the ones interfering in America's elections. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
Indeed, in Commission v France [Katpost here], the CJEU considered that ebooks may be classified as services, rather than goods under the VAT Directive. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2019) This is an important case for anyone arguing secondary indicia — not a good case for patent holders. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The majority in Malloy, per Justice William Brennan, incorporated the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination against the states with little, if any, originalist support. [read post]