Search for: "LJ"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
The judges, Davis LJ and Warby J, released a short summary of their decision [pdf] – with a full judgment to follow later. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
The Shall Not Be Denied Exhibition viewing will begin at 5:30 p.m. and the panel discussion will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 10, LJ-119, Thomas Jefferson Building, 10 First Street S.E., Washington, D.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
The judgment in the Court of Appeal was given by Nicola Davies LJ, with whom McCombe and Coulson LJJ agreed. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
Further, the Court of Appeal had been right to depart from Thirlwall LJ’s finding that Travelers had nothing to do with the uninsured claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
As Floyd LJ wondered in London Taxi: should one take into account or ignore the fact that consumers will recognise the shape? [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
The Court of Appeal (Henderson LJ giving the lead judgment, and with whom Rose LJ and Theis J agreed) found that the review officer had not given reasons as to why Dr Freedman’s evidence had been discounted. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
As found by the Hearing Officer in first instance, Pattern LJ agreed that Unilever had been outwardly unaffected by the Shanks patents, so no outstanding benefit could be attributed. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
[This writer salutes the judicial collaboration jointly undertaken by IP-heavyweight Floyd LJ along with Henderson and Peter Jackson LJJ]. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:43 am
Floyd LJ revisited the leading cases of Biogen v Medeva [1997] and Generics v Lundbeck [2009] on breadth of claim insufficiency. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
Indeed, in R (Stevenson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] EWCA Civ 2123, Henderson LJ went so far as to say that “the need to establish status as a separate requirement has diminished almost to vanishing point”. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The appeal was allowed, with the Circuit Judge relying on the dictum of May LJ in Jones v MBNA International Bank Ltd (2000) EWCA Civ 314 at (52) that there may be exceptional cases in which the principle of finality would not be applied such that new arguments could be raised on appeal. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The Michaelmas Term legal term begins on Tuesday 1 October 2019 and the (intermittent) Inforrm summer break comes to an end today. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm
Américas Award Ceremony and Workshop – Hispanic Reading Room (LJ-240) 5:00 p.m. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:25 am
Baker LJ noted that the judge had not actually seen the documents in question. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
Spain, ([2016] EWHC 2563 (IPEC)), the Court of Appeal (Kitchen LJ and Lewison LJ) was not persuaded that this conclusion necessarily followed from the CJEU’s case law and submitted the question to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling ([2018] EWCA Civ 86). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
On 4 September 2019 the Administrative Court (Haddon-Cave LJ and Swift J) handed down judgment in the case of R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of the South Wales Police [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin). [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
As Lloyd LJ pointed out in Barnsley the allowance of the defence to private law claims must carry with it the public law consequences of relying on such a defence. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
This has been similarly reflected in Sawkins v Hyperion [2005] EWCA Civ 565, where it was set out by Mummery LJ that: a work need only be ‘original’ in the limited sense that the author originated it by his efforts rather than slavishly copying it from the work produced by the efforts of another person.It had been identified that the main creators of the Works had drawn inspiration from art deco, and whilst the elements - when considered individually - were generic, the… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
Gross LJ said at paragraph 24 (vi) that he could not accept that “the statutory review here in issue could be characterised as an application for judicial review and therefore within the s 113(3) exception”. [read post]
