Search for: "LORD V. STATE" Results 341 - 360 of 4,035
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Nadine Dorries announced a new pact on the use and exchange of data between the two nations. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Lord Rothermere has increased his offer to take the Mail, Metro and i publisher DMGT private, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am by INFORRM
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The judgment appelaed is [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 and will be heard at 10:30am in Courtroom Two by Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm by Cyberleagle
There is a question, on the wording of the draft Bill, as to whether a service provider can state that ‘we do nothing about this kind of harmful content’. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Held – appeal dismissed Lord Stephens considered the appellants three grounds of appeal in turn. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
By a 3:2 majority expressed “entirely obiter” (Brownlie II, at [45]) the Court had answered affirmatively: [48]-[55] (Baroness Hale), [56] (Lord Wilson) & [68]-[69] (Lord Clarke). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am by CMS
Lord Burrows stated the illegitimacy of the threat would have been determined with reference to the justification for the demand. [read post]