Search for: "Lancaster v. Lancaster" Results 341 - 360 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 4:15 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Ninth Circuit Upholds Ruling that Sony's God of War Video Game Not Infringing in Dath v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Lancaster attorney Patti Spencer in her Pennsylvania Fiduciary Litigation Blog Pole dancing and an interesting insight into BigLaw document review - Chicago lawyer Patrick J. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Edwards, 222 Tenn. 465, 436 S.W.2d 864, 867 (Tenn. 1969); Lancaster v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by Máiréad Enright
It has been used by several administrations, including in the George Fox 6 case at Lancaster in 2006. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
 The IPKat thanks David Lancaster (Rouse Legal) for this note. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Edwards, 222 Tenn. 465, 436 S.W.2d 864, 867 (Tenn. 1969); Lancaster v. [read post]