Search for: "Law v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 172,712
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ilya Somin (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted Brown, Democracy, and Foot Voting (American Journal of Law and Equality, Symposium on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
It's notoriously difficult to explain the different types of mens rea requirements imposed by criminal laws to first-year law students. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
Without a federal law, individuals must rely on a patchwork of state laws, and Tennessee has taken the lead in expanding its right of publicity laws. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Acting Under Color of State Law: The defendant must have acted “under color of state law” when the action occurred. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Acting Under Color of State Law: The defendant must have acted “under color of state law” when the action occurred. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Acting Under Color of State Law: The defendant must have acted “under color of state law” when the action occurred. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]