Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers" Results 341 - 360 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 12:40 am by Casey Joly (ipSO)
When you get down to the nitty gritty, for Kyo, 3 outfits used in the clip would prove that Aya had used his work and that that use would constitute unfair use of the economic value of his moodboard : √ use of a white dress inspired by the same esthetical atmosphere (sitting behind a desk): the Court disagreed, Aya used a fine white dress with a V-neckline different to the thick white, buttoned-up outfit with lavalliere collared blouse proposed by Kyo; √ use of a yellow dress:… [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:30 am
 (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Gardner’s companion case, Helms v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:48 am
., earliest is possibly "tar-coated leather jug for beer" (1590s), from black + jack in any of its many slang senses. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
The oldest of 6 children, she was born May 18, 1949 in Denver, CO to Elwood V. and Maxine R. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
(Note: the defendant also prevailed in the Court's final antitrust ruling, Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 am
In Fields, the Supreme Court -- beginning a project that it started in Maryland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of the Registration, pursuant… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Sheppard Mullin
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911) rested upon “infirm economic rationales”, and in any event, has been explicitly overruled in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
 001518950 - written in ‘futura’ type and modified graphically), in relation to several classes of goods, including Class 18 (leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins; trunks; valises; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery) and Class 25 (clothing, footwear; headgear). [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 13 - 10 AM: Rocket Trademarks Pty Ltd. v. [read post]