Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 341 - 360
of 672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
Leisure Tech. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
In today’s case (Barr v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
This case is actually pretty much a redux the Steinberg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
Mazooma also supplied the same software to Inspired, who copied and supplied it to the Leisure Link, who installed it on their coin-op terminal. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:34 am
The Third Division of the Colorado Court of Appeals recently interpreted the Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 (the “HPA”) in Heights Healthcare v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:45 am
The opinion in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:28 am
However, it was noted in Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
In today’s case (Olianka v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:50 pm
Well, as our colleagues at Above the Law reported back in September, Justice Stevens's hiring for OT 2010 has proceeded at a somewhat, er, leisurely pace: at last count, the Justice had exactly one law clerk in place for the '10 term. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
In Birke v. [read post]
