Search for: "Lewis v. AT&T Corporate"
Results 341 - 360
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
Adler v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
” Lawyer Mark Lewis pointed out that people don’t always go after the “deep pocketed defendant”; sometimes the company goes for the individual. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984), which applies when a particular transaction is being challenged. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:58 am
Moreover, the order is apparently limited to the pertinent issues, and doesn't permit a fishing expedition into the attorney's impressions of the case or contacts with his clients: If Southern District of New York Judge Lewis A. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
" Senior's brief also cites case precedent, including Tonkery v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm
Rev. 1 (2009) (quoting Paul T. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
LARACH and GREAT AMERICAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:00 pm
[Cal Biz Lit] Marlo Lewis isn't sanguine about the DOJ brief in Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:29 pm
Anschutz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
” The Court held that “the purchase price provision of the agreement [was] unenforceable, and the value of plaintiff's stock should therefore be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in the unrelated New York case, Lewis v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
” The Court held that “the purchase price provision of the agreement [was] unenforceable, and the value of plaintiff's stock should therefore be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in the unrelated New York case, Lewis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:41 pm
Lewis) and one where it is not (see Rales v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
Lewis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:05 pm
Olmstead may not be as important as, say, Gore v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Thus, Citizens United is a boon to corporations. [read post]
